"Outcasts" Open Discussion Thread - Jamie Bamber News
Unofficial. Fan Run. Squeeing is not only welcomed, but encouraged.
asta77
jamiebambernews
asta77
"Outcasts" Open Discussion Thread
84 comments or Leave a comment
Comments
asta77 From: asta77 Date: February 7th, 2011 10:29 pm (UTC) (Link Me)

Re: Outcasts, First Episode

You're implying he left the show, hence "drama". He was approached about appearing in the series and chose to take on the part of Mitchell, who was to die at the end of episode one.

And, FYI, I'm American.
From: (Anonymous) Date: February 7th, 2011 10:56 pm (UTC) (Link Me)

Re: Outcasts, First Episode

If you are American, then read the Federalist Papers...talks about censoring comments you don't like. And it still doesn't change the fact that you chose to censor, and slander, those who disagree with you. Nothing I said breached any norms. As for "drama", you inferred that. I merely commented on what others have mentioned: that the BBC originally hyped his involvement and then it became a "limited ARC role". Nothing sinister inferred. You are implying otherwise. Censor yourself.
From: (Anonymous) Date: February 7th, 2011 11:03 pm (UTC) (Link Me)

Re: Outcasts, First Episode

Of course they would hype his involvement, he's well known in the scifi fanbase. Also they started advertising well after they knew he was only on one episode (which I guess was from the start) so saying it "became" a limited arc doesn't make any sense.
zegeekgirl From: zegeekgirl Date: February 7th, 2011 11:11 pm (UTC) (Link Me)

Re: Outcasts, First Episode

Nothing I said breached any norms.

If by "norms" you mean "people hiding behind hastily constructed IDs or anonymous postings in order to stir up shit rather than offer constructive criticism w/out any pretense or shenanigans"... then yes, that doesn't breach any norms. You're not the first troll in the internet. So.. well done?

84 comments or Leave a comment