"Monday Mornings" Episode 1x02 Discussion Thread: "Deus Ex Machina" - Jamie Bamber News — LiveJournal
Unofficial. Fan Run. Squeeing is not only welcomed, but encouraged.
"Monday Mornings" Episode 1x02 Discussion Thread: "Deus Ex Machina"
33 comments or Leave a comment
asta77 From: asta77 Date: February 13th, 2013 01:12 am (UTC) (Link Me)
So all the doctors were learning that letting a resident do something for the first time might get them in trouble. So that'd be less chances for the residents to learn and that they'd likely be less competent when they complete their residency.

I didn't get that impression. I took it more as a criticism of Tina not doing *her* job, which was talking to the patient, thoroughly explaining the possible consequences of the surgery and obtaining consent, personally. This wasn't made clear, but I'm not sure residents, alone, can obtain consent for surgery. This may yet come up in the deposition. And while I think it was fine for Michelle to do the surgery (and CG is a teaching hospital), was Tina around to supervise? Could she have stepped in and prevented the nerve from being damaged? Could it have been a good teaching moment?

Yeah, there was a certain amount of hypocrisy in Tina wondering if Sydney was rushing into something with Lieberman while she is (likely) cheating on her husband. And if her marriage is bad, then end it. I've seen nothing thus far to make this infidelity acceptable.
zegeekgirl From: zegeekgirl Date: February 13th, 2013 05:22 am (UTC) (Link Me)
Back that up, though; is infidelity ever, in a real sense, acceptable? ;) No, particularly not when it drags on in secret forever, but people make questionable decisions all the time and it does make for good character drama. The challenge the show will have moving forward is to make us invested in what happens to Ty/Tina even if we might not approve of infidelity, or feel as though Tina's estrangement from her husband doesn't merit her sneaking around behind his back, or are actively rooting for them. Whatever the case may be. I would agree that up to now, that isn't quite where we're at yet for all the reasons already mentioned, and we do know from the cast's interviews that there won't be a huge amount of time dedicated to the ins and outs of relationships, but they *can* sell it. It's early days yet.
asta77 From: asta77 Date: February 13th, 2013 01:14 pm (UTC) (Link Me)
Actually, yes, there are instances I feel infidelity is acceptable or perhaps a better term would be understandable. If a spouse is in an abusive relationship and fears for their safety if they leave, and falls into an affair with someone they care about and vice versa, I would hope they'd get out of the marriage, but can understand why not and why they are doing what they are doing. Also, if the couple has an 'open marriage' and relationships outside the marriage are known and condoned by both, well, that's their business and not cheating in the widely accepted sense. I don't see DEK going with either of those scenarios. And, unless they suddenly introduce children, an argument can't even be made for Tina and her husband staying together for their sake. Granted, we've only had one brief scene of Tina and her husband, but what we saw struck me as a marriage where they've grown apart, are living separate lives and aren't really *in* love anymore. So why go through the motions? Why, if you think you're in love with another man, stay with your husband and be unhappy?

And I could go into a whole other rant that would involve bringing up BSG so I'll stop now. ;p
zegeekgirl From: zegeekgirl Date: February 13th, 2013 10:02 pm (UTC) (Link Me)
If a couple has an open marriage, I wouldn't even consider outside partners to *be* infidelity. By the terms which two consenting spouses have chosen to define their marriage in that scenario, no one's being unfaithful. ;) Conversely, even though it's a dire truth that spousal abuse is socially acceptable in many cultures (even some corners of own), to my mind the very idea of it is akin to infidelity in the broader sense of the word (i.e. disloyalty, breach of trust); trusting or having faith in a partner who hits you is a complete anathema to me. So, casting the first stone n' all that...

What I'm trying to say is I'm with you on how one loves or is loved is, yes, totally their business and violence is NEVER okay. That said, even if such circumstances are not in play, plenty of people make lousy decisions that hurt rather than help their circumstances in a marriage; playing in that sandbox for dramatic effect in a show is not something I am compelled to write off unless it drags out too long or the characters aren't allowed to grow as a result.

(I brought it back round to topic, I did! ;) )
33 comments or Leave a comment